June 3, 2022
A Colorado graphic design firm declines to design websites for same-sex weddings because the owner opposes them on religious grounds. The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals held this violates a state law prohibiting businesses from discriminating on the basis of “sexual orientation.” The US Supreme Court agreed to hear the case under the free speech clause of the First Amendment.
RFI position: The lower court’s holding that a faith-based business must endorse same-sex marriage violates the Supreme Court’s assurances in Obergefell that religious freedom, including vigorous protection for religious speech, would not be threatened by its finding of a constitutional right to same-sex marriage.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG

Mar. 23, 2025
Addressing the Precarious Religious Freedom in Iraq

Mar. 21, 2025
U.S. Must Redesignate Nigeria as a CPC Immediately

Mar. 13, 2025
RFI Urges MD Lawmakers to Protect Children, Parents, and Health Care Providers

Feb. 27, 2025
The Intersection of Religious Freedom and Immigration Enforcement

Feb. 21, 2025
Following Quran Burnings, Will Sweden Stumble Into Anti-Blasphemy Laws?
CORNERSTONE FORUM

Jan. 17, 2025
Reaffirming Religious Freedom: Bridging U.S. Advocacy and Iraq’s Constitutional Framework

Dec. 12, 2024
Political Polarization, Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty

Nov. 04, 2024
Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region

Jun. 26, 2024
Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action

May. 05, 2023