June 3, 2022
A Colorado graphic design firm declines to design websites for same-sex weddings because the owner opposes them on religious grounds. The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals held this violates a state law prohibiting businesses from discriminating on the basis of “sexual orientation.” The US Supreme Court agreed to hear the case under the free speech clause of the First Amendment.
RFI position: The lower court’s holding that a faith-based business must endorse same-sex marriage violates the Supreme Court’s assurances in Obergefell that religious freedom, including vigorous protection for religious speech, would not be threatened by its finding of a constitutional right to same-sex marriage.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG
Nov. 21, 2024
In Time For Red Wednesday, New Report Details Christian Persecution In Europe
Nov. 01, 2024
Two Books Opposed by Religious Parents Removed from Montgomery County’s Mandatory “Inclusive” Reading List for Elementary Schools
Oct. 30, 2024
UK’s Lord Jackson of Peterborough Addresses Religious Freedom Concerns in India, Pays Tribute to RFI
Oct. 18, 2024
RFI Conference Confronts Intolerance of Traditional Religious Faith in the West
Oct. 11, 2024
RFI’s Miles Windsor Appointed to Serve as Strategic Advisor to Czech Republic’s Freedom of Religion or Belief Ambassador
CORNERSTONE FORUM
Nov. 04, 2024
Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region
Jun. 26, 2024
Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
May. 05, 2023
Public Bioethics & the Failure of Expressive Individualism
Apr. 28, 2023
Religious Liberty in American Higher Education
Mar. 03, 2023