June 3, 2022
A Colorado graphic design firm declines to design websites for same-sex weddings because the owner opposes them on religious grounds. The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals held this violates a state law prohibiting businesses from discriminating on the basis of “sexual orientation.” The US Supreme Court agreed to hear the case under the free speech clause of the First Amendment.
RFI position: The lower court’s holding that a faith-based business must endorse same-sex marriage violates the Supreme Court’s assurances in Obergefell that religious freedom, including vigorous protection for religious speech, would not be threatened by its finding of a constitutional right to same-sex marriage.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG
Dec. 03, 2024
RFI’s Miles Windsor Joins Panel in UK Parliament to Discuss Religious Repression in Algeria
Nov. 29, 2024
Religious Voices Must Not Be Excluded from UK’s Assisted Suicide Debate
Nov. 27, 2024
RFI President Joins EWTN to Discuss House Resolution Supporting Religious Minorities in Iraq
Nov. 21, 2024
RFI’s Miles Windsor Joins Intercultural and Interfaith Dialogue in Prague
Nov. 21, 2024
In Time For Red Wednesday, New Report Details Christian Persecution In Europe
CORNERSTONE FORUM
Nov. 04, 2024
Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region
Jun. 26, 2024
Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
May. 05, 2023
Public Bioethics & the Failure of Expressive Individualism
Apr. 28, 2023
Religious Liberty in American Higher Education
Mar. 03, 2023