December 26, 2018
The court below held that the constitutionality of a religious monument on public land be assessed under the test of Lemon v. Kurtzman, and on that basis found that a Maryland cross monument was unconstitutional. RFI Position:
The Lemon test has an especially pernicious and disproportionate effect on minority religions by effectively excluding them from public speech and grounds entirely.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG
Dec. 20, 2024
In a Dangerous World, the UK Must Stand Firm on Religious Freedom
Dec. 13, 2024
U.S. Supreme Court Will Decide Whether Serving Those in Need Can Be a Religious Activity
Dec. 13, 2024
Biden’s Department of Education Declares Dead Its Effort to Restrict Religious Student Groups
Dec. 11, 2024
The Founders’ Gift: Free Exercise of Religion
Dec. 06, 2024
Samuel Paty’s Beheading: The Limits Of Speech and Religion
CORNERSTONE FORUM
Dec. 12, 2024
Political Polarization, Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty
Nov. 04, 2024
Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region
Jun. 26, 2024
Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
May. 05, 2023
Public Bioethics & the Failure of Expressive Individualism
Apr. 28, 2023