December 26, 2018

The court below held that the constitutionality of a religious monument on public land be assessed under the test of Lemon v. Kurtzman, and on that basis found that a Maryland cross monument was unconstitutional. RFI Position:
The Lemon test has an especially pernicious and disproportionate effect on minority religions by effectively excluding them from public speech and grounds entirely.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG

May. 23, 2025
Does Southeast Asia Lead the World in Human Flourishing?

May. 16, 2025
RFI Leads Training Session on Religious Freedom Law and Policy for U.S. Army War College

May. 09, 2025
Oral Argument in Charter School Case Highlights Unconstitutional Motives Behind OK Attorney General’s Establishment Clause Claim

May. 02, 2025
Largest Longitudinal Study of Human Flourishing Ever Shows Religion’s Importance

May. 02, 2025
Keys To Human Flourishing: Faith And Relationships Outweigh Wealth
CORNERSTONE FORUM

Jan. 17, 2025
Reaffirming Religious Freedom: Bridging U.S. Advocacy and Iraq’s Constitutional Framework

Dec. 12, 2024
Political Polarization, Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty

Nov. 04, 2024
Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region

Jun. 26, 2024
Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action

May. 05, 2023