August 23, 2019
The court below held that discrimination against an employee because of sexual orientation or gender identity constitutes prohibited employment discrimination “because of . . . sex” within the meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
RFI Position: If “sex” in the 1964 Civil Rights Act means gender identiy, Muslim-owned businesses will effectively be forced to endorse this practice and provide a platform for it.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG
Mar. 23, 2025
Addressing the Precarious Religious Freedom in Iraq
Mar. 21, 2025
U.S. Must Redesignate Nigeria as a CPC Immediately
Mar. 13, 2025
RFI Urges MD Lawmakers to Protect Children, Parents, and Health Care Providers
Feb. 27, 2025
The Intersection of Religious Freedom and Immigration Enforcement
Feb. 21, 2025
Following Quran Burnings, Will Sweden Stumble Into Anti-Blasphemy Laws?
CORNERSTONE FORUM
Jan. 17, 2025
Reaffirming Religious Freedom: Bridging U.S. Advocacy and Iraq’s Constitutional Framework
Dec. 12, 2024
Political Polarization, Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty
Nov. 04, 2024
Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region
Jun. 26, 2024
Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
May. 05, 2023