August 23, 2019
The court below held that discrimination against an employee because of sexual orientation or gender identity constitutes prohibited employment discrimination “because of . . . sex” within the meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
RFI Position: If “sex” in the 1964 Civil Rights Act means gender identiy, Muslim-owned businesses will effectively be forced to endorse this practice and provide a platform for it.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG
Dec. 20, 2024
In a Dangerous World, the UK Must Stand Firm on Religious Freedom
Dec. 13, 2024
U.S. Supreme Court Will Decide Whether Serving Those in Need Can Be a Religious Activity
Dec. 13, 2024
Biden’s Department of Education Declares Dead Its Effort to Restrict Religious Student Groups
Dec. 11, 2024
The Founders’ Gift: Free Exercise of Religion
Dec. 06, 2024
Samuel Paty’s Beheading: The Limits Of Speech and Religion
CORNERSTONE FORUM
Dec. 12, 2024
Political Polarization, Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty
Nov. 04, 2024
Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region
Jun. 26, 2024
Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
May. 05, 2023
Public Bioethics & the Failure of Expressive Individualism
Apr. 28, 2023