August 23, 2019
The court below held that discrimination against an employee because of sexual orientation or gender identity constitutes prohibited employment discrimination “because of . . . sex” within the meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
RFI Position: If “sex” in the 1964 Civil Rights Act means gender identiy, Muslim-owned businesses will effectively be forced to endorse this practice and provide a platform for it.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG
Nov. 21, 2024
RFI’s Miles Windsor Joins Intercultural and Interfaith Dialogue in Prague
Nov. 21, 2024
In Time For Red Wednesday, New Report Details Christian Persecution In Europe
Nov. 01, 2024
Two Books Opposed by Religious Parents Removed from Montgomery County’s Mandatory “Inclusive” Reading List for Elementary Schools
Oct. 30, 2024
UK’s Lord Jackson of Peterborough Addresses Religious Freedom Concerns in India, Pays Tribute to RFI
Oct. 18, 2024
RFI Conference Confronts Intolerance of Traditional Religious Faith in the West
CORNERSTONE FORUM
Nov. 04, 2024
Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region
Jun. 26, 2024
Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
May. 05, 2023
Public Bioethics & the Failure of Expressive Individualism
Apr. 28, 2023
Religious Liberty in American Higher Education
Mar. 03, 2023