August 23, 2019
The court below held that discrimination against an employee because of sexual orientation or gender identity constitutes prohibited employment discrimination “because of . . . sex” within the meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
RFI Position: If “sex” in the 1964 Civil Rights Act means gender identiy, Muslim-owned businesses will effectively be forced to endorse this practice and provide a platform for it.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG
Jun. 05, 2025
Is Egypt’s Government Trying To Take Over Christianity’s Most Important Monastery?
May. 23, 2025
Does Southeast Asia Lead the World in Human Flourishing?
May. 16, 2025
RFI Leads Training Session on Religious Freedom Law and Policy for U.S. Army War College
May. 09, 2025
Oral Argument in Charter School Case Highlights Unconstitutional Motives Behind OK Attorney General’s Establishment Clause Claim
May. 02, 2025
Largest Longitudinal Study of Human Flourishing Ever Shows Religion’s Importance
CORNERSTONE FORUM
Jan. 17, 2025
Reaffirming Religious Freedom: Bridging U.S. Advocacy and Iraq’s Constitutional Framework
Dec. 12, 2024
Political Polarization, Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty
Nov. 04, 2024
Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region
Jun. 26, 2024
Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
May. 05, 2023