August 23, 2019
The court below held that discrimination against an employee because of sexual orientation or gender identity constitutes prohibited employment discrimination “because of . . . sex” within the meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
RFI Position: If “sex” in the 1964 Civil Rights Act means gender identiy, Muslim-owned businesses will effectively be forced to endorse this practice and provide a platform for it.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG
Jan. 17, 2025
RFI Participates in Summit on Post-Election Trends, Hopes, and Challenges for Faith-Based Service Organizations
Jan. 16, 2025
Religious Freedom Day 2025: What Religious Freedom Is, and Is Not
Jan. 08, 2025
Experiments in Virtue: Byron Johnson on Religion in Prisons
Jan. 06, 2025
It’s Time for American Elites to Rediscover Human Nature: Lessons from United States v. Skrmetti
Dec. 20, 2024
In a Dangerous World, the UK Must Stand Firm on Religious Freedom
CORNERSTONE FORUM
Jan. 17, 2025
Reaffirming Religious Freedom: Bridging U.S. Advocacy and Iraq’s Constitutional Framework
Dec. 12, 2024
Political Polarization, Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty
Nov. 04, 2024
Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region
Jun. 26, 2024
Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
May. 05, 2023