Summary of facts: A mother seeks to represent her minor children in challenging a California school district that she alleges engaged in racial discrimination while her children were enrolled. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit held that parents do not have a right to represent their children in court and must hire an attorney.
RFI’s position: Even if the government has a legitimate interest in ensuring that children receive competent representation, such an interest does not outweigh parents’ fundamental right to decide how their children’s interests are represented. For many parents of faith, the exercise of that right has religious dimensions that will be threatened if the lower courts’ holdings are allowed to stand. The Supreme Court should agree to hear the case and settle the dispute among the federal and state courts on this matter.
Read the brief here.
THE RFI BLOG

Does Southeast Asia Lead the World in Human Flourishing?

RFI Leads Training Session on Religious Freedom Law and Policy for U.S. Army War College

Oral Argument in Charter School Case Highlights Unconstitutional Motives Behind OK Attorney General’s Establishment Clause Claim

Largest Longitudinal Study of Human Flourishing Ever Shows Religion’s Importance

Keys To Human Flourishing: Faith And Relationships Outweigh Wealth
CORNERSTONE FORUM

Reaffirming Religious Freedom: Bridging U.S. Advocacy and Iraq’s Constitutional Framework

Political Polarization, Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty

Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region

Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
