Summary of facts: An evangelical Christian working for the US Postal Service (USPS) asked for Sundays off in order to observe the Sabbath and the USPS rejected his request. The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held, under the Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in TWA v. Hardison, USPS was not required under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act to accommodate his request because doing so would impose on it more than a de minimis (i.e., nominal) cost. The employee appealed to the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear his case.
RFI’s position: Hardison’s misinterpretation of Title VII eviscerates the right to workplace accommodations for practitioners of all faiths, it has especially damaging effects for religious minorities. Adherents to minority faiths more often require workplace accommodations because their religious traditions are not already accommodated. Because Hardison strips Title VII of any meaningful accommodation requirement, employees whose religious practices include a certain appearance or attire may be forced to give up either the religious practice or the job. Both Muslim and Sikh employees have distinct practices that may require modest accommodations in some workplaces. Yet, pursuant to Hardison, courts and employers have rejected Sikh and Muslim workers’ requests for reasonable accommodations in dozens of cases under the de minimis rule.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG

Addressing the Precarious Religious Freedom in Iraq

U.S. Must Redesignate Nigeria as a CPC Immediately

RFI Urges MD Lawmakers to Protect Children, Parents, and Health Care Providers

The Intersection of Religious Freedom and Immigration Enforcement

Following Quran Burnings, Will Sweden Stumble Into Anti-Blasphemy Laws?
CORNERSTONE FORUM

Reaffirming Religious Freedom: Bridging U.S. Advocacy and Iraq’s Constitutional Framework

Political Polarization, Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty

Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region

Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
