Paul Marshall, Director of RFI’s South and Southeast Action Team, this week co-authored an article in the Washington Examiner with Nina Shea, Senior Fellow at the Hudson Institute, titled, “In Finland, expressing religious beliefs is ‘hate speech.’”
The authors highlight a case in which Finland’s Helsinki District Court is considering criminal hate speech charges against a Christian Democratic parliamentarian and a Lutheran bishop for tweeting Bible verses that forbid homosexual activity. They also examine the case within the larger legal and political landscape in Finland and the implications for future censorship of traditional religious beliefs. They write:
It remains to be seen whether the court will give any weight to Finland’s millennium-old Christian tradition and common beliefs about marriage (gay marriage only became legal in Finland in 2017) and permit continued debate on public issues — and whether it will consider the central importance of the freedoms of speech and religion in a democracy. These freedoms were established to protect unpopular, even heretical, beliefs and opinions.
Read the full article: In Finland, expressing religious beliefs is ‘hate speech.’
THE RFI BLOG

Oral Argument in Charter School Case Highlights Unconstitutional Motives Behind OK Attorney General’s Establishment Clause Claim

Largest Longitudinal Study of Human Flourishing Ever Shows Religion’s Importance

Keys To Human Flourishing: Faith And Relationships Outweigh Wealth

RFI Champions Religious Freedom at Kurdistan’s First National Prayer Breakfast

RFI’s Ismail Royer Speaks at Supreme Court Rally for Religious Parents Seeking Opt-Out
CORNERSTONE FORUM

Reaffirming Religious Freedom: Bridging U.S. Advocacy and Iraq’s Constitutional Framework

Political Polarization, Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty

Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region

Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
