September 29, 2020
The government attempted to moot a constitutional challenge to its policy merely by changing that policy after a lawsuit had been filed.
RFI Position: The government should not be able to violate the constitution without consequence simply by changing its ways before litigation concludes.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG
Nov. 01, 2024
Two Books Opposed by Religious Parents Removed from Montgomery County’s Mandatory “Inclusive” Reading List for Elementary Schools
Oct. 30, 2024
UK’s Lord Jackson of Peterborough Addresses Religious Freedom Concerns in India, Pays Tribute to RFI
Oct. 18, 2024
RFI Conference Confronts Intolerance of Traditional Religious Faith in the West
Oct. 11, 2024
RFI’s Miles Windsor Appointed to Serve as Strategic Advisor to Czech Republic’s Freedom of Religion or Belief Ambassador
Oct. 10, 2024
RFI Joins Religious Freedom Experts to Warn of Growing Intolerance Towards Traditional Religious Beliefs in the West
CORNERSTONE FORUM
Nov. 04, 2024
Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region
Jun. 26, 2024
Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
May. 05, 2023
Public Bioethics & the Failure of Expressive Individualism
Apr. 28, 2023
Religious Liberty in American Higher Education
Mar. 03, 2023