Ismail Royer, Director of RFI’s Islam and Religious Freedom Action Team, recently wrote an essay published in First Things titled, “A Tale of Two Muslim Generations.” In the piece, Royer discusses a recent case at Hamline University in which the school fired an art history professor, Dr. Erika López Prater, after a student complained about the professor’s use of a centuries-old depiction of Muhammad by a pious Muslim artist in her class. Royer argues that the incident reveals a tendency, common among many Muslims today, to view “Islam [as] less a religion with truth claims about the nature of God and mankind’s relationship to him than an aggrieved identity group among other identity groups.”
Royer writes:
No orthodox Muslim would be pleased with any depiction of Muhammad, even if it was made with respectful intent. But clearly this case is not just about concern over the risk of iconography or the sanctity of the prophet. According to the student’s statement, her objection is grounded in her wounded feelings, not her vigilance over the sacred. And it is not clear whence the wound to her feelings “as a Muslim” arises, especially given that the image in question was made by a Muslim with devotion and respect. It is even less clear why this image made any impression at all on her feelings “as a black person.”
This case, therefore, is not primarily about a Muslim insisting that broader society observe her faith’s pieties, nor about a student objecting to mockery of her faith. Both scenarios would, of course, raise their own distinct questions about legitimate rights, duties, and expectations in a pluralistic society. But those scenarios would also involve, along with the complainant’s subjective understanding, empirical facts constituting grounds for a claim. In contrast, the gravamen of the offense in the Hamline case is elusive.
Some have described Hamline as representing a contemporary case of blasphemy. This is true only by analogy. Premodern man saw blasphemy as a real affront to the sanctity of God. In modernity, our gaze turned from the divine to the world, and blasphemy was punishable as a threat to religion’s political and social effectiveness. In our postmodern culture, our gaze has turned completely inward. We now see blasphemy as a crime against our new god: the self.
Read the full article: “A Tale of Two Muslim Generations.”
THE RFI BLOG

Emerging Tech and Religious Freedom

RFI Participates in Summit on Post-Election Trends, Hopes, and Challenges for Faith-Based Service Organizations

Religious Freedom Day 2025: What Religious Freedom Is, and Is Not

Experiments in Virtue: Byron Johnson on Religion in Prisons

It’s Time for American Elites to Rediscover Human Nature: Lessons from United States v. Skrmetti
CORNERSTONE FORUM

Reaffirming Religious Freedom: Bridging U.S. Advocacy and Iraq’s Constitutional Framework

Political Polarization, Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty

Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region

Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
