
The court below held that the constitutionality of a religious monument on public land be assessed under the test of Lemon v. Kurtzman, and on that basis found that a Maryland cross monument was unconstitutional. RFI Position:
The Lemon test has an especially pernicious and disproportionate effect on minority religions by effectively excluding them from public speech and grounds entirely.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG

Jun. 02, 2023
Reflections on Justice and Religious Liberty

Jun. 02, 2023
The Moral Urgency of Memorial Day

May. 26, 2023
Revisiting Religious Freedom as a National Security Lens: The Case of China

May. 25, 2023
RFI’s Nathan Berkeley Joins NRB Panel on Deplatforming Risks for Religious Ministries

May. 19, 2023
RFI’s David Trimble Convenes Meeting with Taiwanese Delegation on Capitol Hill
CORNERSTONE FORUM

May. 05, 2023
Public Bioethics & the Failure of Expressive Individualism

Apr. 28, 2023
Religious Liberty in American Higher Education

Mar. 03, 2023
Scotland’s Kate Forbes and the March of Secularism

Dec. 09, 2022
70 Years of Religious Freedom in Sweden: Prospects and Challenges

Nov. 23, 2022