August 23, 2019
The court below held that discrimination against an employee because of sexual orientation or gender identity constitutes prohibited employment discrimination “because of . . . sex” within the meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
RFI Position: If “sex” in the 1964 Civil Rights Act means gender identiy, Muslim-owned businesses will effectively be forced to endorse this practice and provide a platform for it.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG
Apr. 05, 2024
How Soccer Reveals Different Meanings Of ‘Secular’ In France And The US
Apr. 05, 2024
RFI’s Ismail Royer Meets with Delegation from India
Apr. 03, 2024
Protecting the Unborn, Mothers, and Medical Ethics: The Stakes of Arkansas’ Amendment
Mar. 29, 2024
Wisconsin Supreme Court Punishes Catholic Charities for Serving Everyone
Mar. 22, 2024
Wisconsin Supreme Court Decision Truncates Religion
CORNERSTONE FORUM
May. 05, 2023
Public Bioethics & the Failure of Expressive Individualism
Apr. 28, 2023
Religious Liberty in American Higher Education
Mar. 03, 2023
Scotland’s Kate Forbes and the March of Secularism
Dec. 09, 2022
70 Years of Religious Freedom in Sweden: Prospects and Challenges
Nov. 23, 2022