August 23, 2019
The court below held that discrimination against an employee because of sexual orientation or gender identity constitutes prohibited employment discrimination “because of . . . sex” within the meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
RFI Position: If “sex” in the 1964 Civil Rights Act means gender identiy, Muslim-owned businesses will effectively be forced to endorse this practice and provide a platform for it.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG
Jul. 26, 2024
Myths of Religious Nationalism in America and Abroad
Jul. 26, 2024
France’s Olympic Hijab Ban Violates International Law And Exacerbates Tensions
Jul. 25, 2024
RFI Briefs USCIRF on Lessons from 25 Years of U.S. Designating Religious Freedom Violators
Jul. 23, 2024
Thought Police: Protecting the People from Prayer
Jul. 22, 2024
A Religious “Delaware”: Establishing a State Haven for Religious Corporations
CORNERSTONE FORUM
Jun. 26, 2024
Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
May. 05, 2023
Public Bioethics & the Failure of Expressive Individualism
Apr. 28, 2023
Religious Liberty in American Higher Education
Mar. 03, 2023
Scotland’s Kate Forbes and the March of Secularism
Dec. 09, 2022