Summary of facts: Catholic Charities Bureau sought a religious exemption from the state’s unemployment compensation system so that it could join the Wisconsin Bishop’s unemployment compensation plan (which is more efficient and provides the same level of benefits). Under Wisconsin law, any non-profit “operated primarily for religious purposes” qualifies for this exemption. But the court of appeals in this case held that CCB did not qualify because (1) it was separately incorporated from the Diocese and (2) its “activities” (serving the poor, etc.) were primarily charitable, not religious.
RFI’s position: By imposing the state’s view of what it means to be religious, based on organizational structure and the who and how of charitable service, the Commission and the appeals court are prescribing a single form of religious orthodoxy in the context of the state unemployment law. That violates the U.S. Constitution’s Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses, together with the well-recognized “church autonomy doctrine” that is grounded in both Clauses.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG

Emerging Tech and Religious Freedom

RFI Participates in Summit on Post-Election Trends, Hopes, and Challenges for Faith-Based Service Organizations

Religious Freedom Day 2025: What Religious Freedom Is, and Is Not

Experiments in Virtue: Byron Johnson on Religion in Prisons

It’s Time for American Elites to Rediscover Human Nature: Lessons from United States v. Skrmetti
CORNERSTONE FORUM

Reaffirming Religious Freedom: Bridging U.S. Advocacy and Iraq’s Constitutional Framework

Political Polarization, Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty

Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region

Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
