Summary of facts: Michigan’s civil rights law, which state courts recently reinterpreted to include “sexual orientation and gender identity,” now requires religious organizations like Christian Healthcare Centers (CHC) to hire people who do not share their faith, to prescribe cross-sex hormones to facilitate efforts to alter a patient’s biological sex, and to use pronouns that do not accord with a person’s biological sex. CHC sued in federal district court, alleging that these requirements violate its First Amendment religious rights and seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent enforcement of state law. The court denied the motion, and CHC appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
RFI’s position: The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits states from interfering in the hiring practices of religious institutions, including organizations like CHC. This principle is reflected in the policies of both federal and state governments. The state’s restriction of religious organizations’ ability to make religiously informed personnel decisions would have an especially harmful effect on minority religious groups such as Jews and Muslims. The court should invalidate this aspect of Michigan law.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG

Emerging Tech and Religious Freedom

RFI Participates in Summit on Post-Election Trends, Hopes, and Challenges for Faith-Based Service Organizations

Religious Freedom Day 2025: What Religious Freedom Is, and Is Not

Experiments in Virtue: Byron Johnson on Religion in Prisons

It’s Time for American Elites to Rediscover Human Nature: Lessons from United States v. Skrmetti
CORNERSTONE FORUM

Reaffirming Religious Freedom: Bridging U.S. Advocacy and Iraq’s Constitutional Framework

Political Polarization, Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty

Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region

Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
