New York prison officials shut down a longstanding weekly Quaker worship service, conducted by outside volunteers, on security grounds, and unilaterally replaced it with a differently-structured religious service. Incarcerated and non-incarcerated Quakers sued under the First Amendment and Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). The district court dismissed the suit on several grounds, including that prison officials’ replacement of the Quaker worship service did not impinge on the plaintiffs’ religious exercise. The Court of Appeals affirmed.
RFI Position: The decisions of the district and appellate courts violate the First Amendment rights of non-prisoners and prisoners alike. Religious bodies, not judges, are the determiners of what constitutes religious exercise.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG

Remembering and Aiding the Victims of Communism

Religion Is Dying? Don’t Believe It

RFI Joins Letter Urging GOP Senators to Oppose ‘Respect for Marriage Act’

RFI’s Senior Fellow Charles Ramsey Interviewed on Plight of Christians in Afghanistan

Putting Religious Freedom Back on the Map
CORNERSTONE FORUM

Five Promising Steps Forward for Religious Freedom: Reflections on Recommendations Offered at the 2022 IRF Summit

Today’s Fight for Religious Freedom

For everyone, everywhere: Essential ‘next steps’ to summits and ministerials to advance religious freedom for all

Nigeria, the Church, and Religious Freedom: Challenges and Opportunities to Secure this Right
