Summary of facts: A high school football coach lost his job after he knelt at midfield after games to offer a quiet personal prayer. The coach sued in federal court, alleging that the school district violated his rights under the Free Speech and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment. He lost in the trial court and the court of appeals affirmed.
RFI’s position: Adherents to Orthodox Judaism, Islam, and other minority faiths engage in public practices that may draw the attention of non-adherents. Uncommon practices are more likely to stand out or arouse curiosity, and therefore to be perceived as “visible to students.” The decision of the court of appeals would allow or even require public schools to ban such private religious conduct simply because of its heightened visibility. The Court should reverse the decision below and reaffirm that public school teachers are permitted to engage in private non-coercive religious conduct even if it happens to be visible to students.
Read the amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG

RFI’s Ismail Royer Speaks at 2026 IRF Summit in Support of Religious Prisoner of Conscience Ali Ünal

RFI President Speaks During IRF Summit Advocacy Day on Foreign Assistance that Actually Helps the Persecuted

RFI Convenes International Religious Freedom Reception at Hungarian Embassy

RFI Opens IRF Summit with University Partnership Program for Fourth Year in a Row

Religious Freedom Day 2026: America’s First Freedom, Why Then and Why Now?
CORNERSTONE FORUM

Reaffirming Religious Freedom: Bridging U.S. Advocacy and Iraq’s Constitutional Framework

Political Polarization, Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty

Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region

Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action


