In an article published this week in WORLD Magazine, RFI Executive Vice President Eric Patterson argues that rights of conscience must extend to medical professionals and religious hospitals. He also discusses a state-level legislative effort that has seen recent success in South Carolina, and which is part of a broader Medical Conscience Rights Initiative. Patterson writes:
On June 15, South Carolina became the third state to protect the religious freedom of medical professionals by passing the Medical Ethics and Diversity Act (known as the “Med Act”), which defends medical practitioners from being coerced to violate their sacred oath to “Do no harm.”
Sadly, egregious violations of conscience rights abound. One example is a nurse at the University of Vermont Medical Center, whose objection to participation in abortions was widely known and appropriately documented. But she was manipulated under false pretenses into assisting in the operating room without the surgeon or staff informing her that she would be participating in an abortion until it was too late.
At its roots, the Med Act defends human dignity. Medical professionals swear by the ancient Hippocratic oath to “do no harm.” Thus, they vow to give their best care to those entrusted to them. In addition to the dignity of the patient, the dignity of the practitioner is at stake. It is morally wrong to require doctors, nurses, or other healthcare staff to park their religiously informed convictions at the door before they walk in to work.
Read the full article: Protecting religious freedom within medicine.
THE RFI BLOG

Reflections on Justice and Religious Liberty

The Moral Urgency of Memorial Day

Revisiting Religious Freedom as a National Security Lens: The Case of China

RFI’s Nathan Berkeley Joins NRB Panel on Deplatforming Risks for Religious Ministries

RFI’s David Trimble Convenes Meeting with Taiwanese Delegation on Capitol Hill
CORNERSTONE FORUM

Public Bioethics & the Failure of Expressive Individualism

Religious Liberty in American Higher Education

Scotland’s Kate Forbes and the March of Secularism

70 Years of Religious Freedom in Sweden: Prospects and Challenges
