In an article published in Dignitas, a journal of The Center for Bioethics & Human Dignity, Andrew Kubick, Research Fellow with RFI’s National Center for Religious Freedom Education, offers a glimpse into the subject of positive conscience claims, which “demand the freedom to commit an act that one’s conscience judges to be good.” He reflects on this subject in the healthcare context, especially in cases where a medical practitioner’s claim runs up against a hospital’s institutional identity.
“Many people,” observes Kubick, “are familiar with cases when a healthcare professional advances a negative claim of conscience, that is to say, when the professional refuses to perform or participate in a service that he judges is evil.” But history provides many examples “that both negative and positive claims of conscience can result in coercion, discrimination, and even disciplinary action by those in authority.”
Kubick presented a version of this article at the 2022 Annual Conference of The Center for Bioethics & Human Dignity convened last summer.
Read the full article: Who Decides? Resolving Conflicts between Individual Conscience and Institutional Identity.
THE RFI BLOG

Oral Argument in Charter School Case Highlights Unconstitutional Motives Behind OK Attorney General’s Establishment Clause Claim

Largest Longitudinal Study of Human Flourishing Ever Shows Religion’s Importance

Keys To Human Flourishing: Faith And Relationships Outweigh Wealth

RFI Champions Religious Freedom at Kurdistan’s First National Prayer Breakfast

RFI’s Ismail Royer Speaks at Supreme Court Rally for Religious Parents Seeking Opt-Out
CORNERSTONE FORUM

Reaffirming Religious Freedom: Bridging U.S. Advocacy and Iraq’s Constitutional Framework

Political Polarization, Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty

Bridging the Gap Between International Efforts and Local Realities: Advancing Religious Freedom in the MENA Region

Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
