Paul Marshall, Director of RFI’s South and Southeast Action Team, this week co-authored an article in the Washington Examiner with Nina Shea, Senior Fellow at the Hudson Institute, titled, “In Finland, expressing religious beliefs is ‘hate speech.’”
The authors highlight a case in which Finland’s Helsinki District Court is considering criminal hate speech charges against a Christian Democratic parliamentarian and a Lutheran bishop for tweeting Bible verses that forbid homosexual activity. They also examine the case within the larger legal and political landscape in Finland and the implications for future censorship of traditional religious beliefs. They write:
It remains to be seen whether the court will give any weight to Finland’s millennium-old Christian tradition and common beliefs about marriage (gay marriage only became legal in Finland in 2017) and permit continued debate on public issues — and whether it will consider the central importance of the freedoms of speech and religion in a democracy. These freedoms were established to protect unpopular, even heretical, beliefs and opinions.
Read the full article: In Finland, expressing religious beliefs is ‘hate speech.’
THE RFI BLOG

RFI President Gives Distinguished Reich Lecture at U.S. Air Force Academy

RFI’s Nathaniel Hurd and Andrew Kubick Interviewed on Religious Freedom’s Deepest Questions

Religious Freedom Failures in Algeria Must Be Addressed

RFI President Eric Patterson: “Niger, Coups, and Violence in West Africa”

RFI Champions Rights of Muslim and Christian Parents, Files Amicus Brief in Fourth Circuit
CORNERSTONE FORUM

Public Bioethics & the Failure of Expressive Individualism

Religious Liberty in American Higher Education

Scotland’s Kate Forbes and the March of Secularism

70 Years of Religious Freedom in Sweden: Prospects and Challenges
