Religious employees now have greater protection to exercise their faith in the workplace following this week’s unanimous Supreme Court decision in Groff v. DeJoy. In Groff, the Court remedied nearly 50 years of regular misinterpretation in the lower courts as to the religious accommodation requirements in Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The source of the error was the 1977 decision, TWA v. Hardison, which said that an employer needs to show only a de minimis burden to deny an employee’s request for a religious accommodation.
RFI’s Islam and Religious Freedom Action Team joined Muslim Advocates and The Sikh Coalition in filing an amicus brief in this case, which the Court cited on page 13 of the decision:
…a bevy of diverse religious organizations has told this Court that the de minimis test has blessed the denial of even minor accommodation in many cases, making it harder for members of minority faiths to enter the job market. See, e.g., Brief for The Sikh Coalition et al. as Amici Curiae 15, 19–20 (“the de minimis standard eliminates any meaningful mandate to accommodate Sikh practices in the workplace” and “emboldens employers to deny reasonable accommodation requests”)…
Read the Supreme Court’s decision in Groff v. DeJoy here and read RFI’s amicus brief here.
THE RFI BLOG
![Featured image for “Myths of Religious Nationalism in America and Abroad”](https://religiousfreedominstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Rumi-Forum-Article_PMarshall.png)
Myths of Religious Nationalism in America and Abroad
![Featured image for “France’s Olympic Hijab Ban Violates International Law And Exacerbates Tensions”](https://religiousfreedominstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/hijab-scaled.jpg)
France’s Olympic Hijab Ban Violates International Law And Exacerbates Tensions
![Featured image for “RFI Briefs USCIRF on Lessons from 25 Years of U.S. Designating Religious Freedom Violators”](https://religiousfreedominstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/USCIRF-CPC-SWL-Map.png)
RFI Briefs USCIRF on Lessons from 25 Years of U.S. Designating Religious Freedom Violators
![Featured image for “Thought Police: Protecting the People from Prayer”](https://religiousfreedominstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Screen-Shot-2024-07-24-at-5.52.51-PM.png)
Thought Police: Protecting the People from Prayer
![Featured image for “A Religious “Delaware”: Establishing a State Haven for Religious Corporations”](https://religiousfreedominstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Screen-Shot-2024-07-19-at-5.01.49-PM.png)
A Religious “Delaware”: Establishing a State Haven for Religious Corporations
CORNERSTONE FORUM
![Featured image for “Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action”](https://religiousfreedominstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/IMG_3666.jpg)
Challenges to Religious Freedom in Iraq and the Critical Need for Action
![Featured image for “Public Bioethics & the Failure of Expressive Individualism”](https://religiousfreedominstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/headshot.jpg)
Public Bioethics & the Failure of Expressive Individualism
![Featured image for “Religious Liberty in American Higher Education”](https://religiousfreedominstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/031623-Jennifer-Lichter-002-e1682974563353.png)
Religious Liberty in American Higher Education
![Featured image for “Scotland’s Kate Forbes and the March of Secularism”](https://religiousfreedominstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Jerry-Li-Pic01.jpg)
Scotland’s Kate Forbes and the March of Secularism
![Featured image for “70 Years of Religious Freedom in Sweden: Prospects and Challenges”](https://religiousfreedominstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Jacob-380-e1447190060158.jpg)