In an article published today at Religion Unplugged titled, “Wisconsin Court Shouldn’t Confine Religion Within Church Walls” RFI’s Paul Marshall highlights a case that will decide whether “a Catholic charity is ‘religious’ enough to qualify for the legal benefits that apply to religious organizations.” The court is taking this case — Catholic Charities Bureau v. Wisconsin Labor & Industrial Review Commission — because two lower court decisions, involving two different Catholic charities, came to opposite conclusions. Marshall writes:
One ruling allowed a Catholic disabilities nonprofit to opt out of Wisconsin’s state unemployment system and instead contribute to a church-run system. In the second ruling, in a similar case, a different court denied the application from the charity, which has now appealed the decision. The appeals court upheld this decision, and the appeal has now gone to the state’s Supreme Court.
The major question that the justices will consider is whether the organizations are more “charitable” than “religious.” In its submission, the Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission argued the increasingly common and pernicious view that if a charity provides services to people of all faiths and doesn’t evangelize, then it should not receive a religious exemption.
Read the full article: “Wisconsin Court Shouldn’t Confine Religion Within Church Walls.”
THE RFI BLOG

RFI President Gives Distinguished Reich Lecture at U.S. Air Force Academy

RFI’s Nathaniel Hurd and Andrew Kubick Join Interview on Religious Freedom’s Deepest Questions

Religious Freedom Failures in Algeria Must Be Addressed

RFI President Eric Patterson: “Niger, Coups, and Violence in West Africa”

RFI Champions Rights of Muslim and Christian Parents, Files Amicus Brief in Fourth Circuit
CORNERSTONE FORUM

Public Bioethics & the Failure of Expressive Individualism

Religious Liberty in American Higher Education

Scotland’s Kate Forbes and the March of Secularism

70 Years of Religious Freedom in Sweden: Prospects and Challenges
